Despite a political climate that is more toxic than at any other time in living memory, and despite mounting allegations and investigations against the president, Pelosi is of the view that “impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country.”
In other words, notwithstanding anything revealed by Mueller and others, if an impeachment effort is bound to fail, it is simply not worth the negatives that will inevitably accompany the process.
The Democrats have long accused President Trump of cynical manipulation of the political system for his own ends, and yet, it would appear that whenever they are given the opportunity to address their concerns by means of that very same political system, they hold their fire. If that is not cynicism, what is?
The impeachment process is not just about getting rid of a person in power who is believed to be corrupt. It also serves another purpose; it allows the people an opportunity of addressing their serious concerns regarding suitability for office without resorting to violent revolution. Powerful leaders can be held publicly accountable for their actions, whether or not the process ultimately leads to their removal.
Earlier this week, a New York Times article written by former Hillary Clinton aide Philippe Reines debunked the myth that the failed 1998 Bill Clinton impeachment process backfired on the Republicans, and although Reines’ article is hopelessly biased against Trump, he has a point. Republicans benefitted from the public hearings by going on to maintain control of the House and Senate until 2006, and, more impressively, by winning three of the five presidential elections that have followed.
I have my doubts as to whether President Trump is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, but Nancy Pelosi certainly believes he is. On that basis, for her to abandon impeachment on the basis of cynical political considerations is nothing short of an abrogation of her duty as an elected official.
Leaders, and anyone who holds public
In a letter to the synagogue membership last Friday, he explained that he had “fallen short of the standards expected of me” and said that he was deeply sorry to have let them down.
No specific reasons have been given for his sudden departure, but the swift resignation and public contrition are a welcome change from the drawn-out denials and contemptible self-serving moves of powerful figures accused of falling short of the standards expected of them. And while our Jewish world is just as prone to this disease as everyone else, this latest episode in London is truer to the way things should be done, as laid down in the Torah, the foundational scripture of our faith.
The portion of Vayikra contains the laws regarding leaders who
The phrase introducing us to these laws is worded quite clumsily (Lev. 4:22): אֲשֶר נָשִֹיא יֶֽחֱטָא – which translates as “when a ruler sins”, but should really begin with the Hebrew word “ve’im” rather than with the word “asher”, which means ‘that’ and is never used in this context.
Rashi cites the Talmud (Horayot 10b) which explains that the word “asher” is connected in meaning to the Hebrew word “
Rabbi Yissocher Frand, quoting Rabbi Dovid Feinstein, offers a remarkable insight into Rashi’s explanation of the word “asher”. People in power almost never admit that they have done something wrong, fearing criticism and being undermined by their opponents.
“How many times have we heard the President of the United States –
anyPresident of the United States – admit, ‘I have made a mistake’… Rare is the public leader who is prepared to stand up in front of his nation and admit to having made a mistake. Happy is the generation that has a leader who is not ashamed to admit that he has erred. Fortunate are those led by one secure enough to admit that he is not perfect.”
Jewish tradition teaches us that the origins of Judaism’s robust but humane teshuva (repentance) process can be found in the emotional confession of King David to Nathan the prophet in the episode of Bathsheba (2 Sam. 12:13): “I stand guilty before God!” he exclaimed. And Nathan replied, “God has remitted your sin; you shall not die.”
The great King David,
We must always hold our leaders to the highest standards, and pursue any process that ensures those standards are upheld. But more importantly, our leaders must hold themselves to those high standards, and never fear the consequences of any revelations, nor of admitting their mistakes.
Those that follow this path are foretold to become the leaders of a “happy” generation.
Photo: Nanci Pelosi patronizingly claps for President Trump during his State of the Union address to Congress on February 5, 2019